Author Archive

Ask Wolf!

Anyone who knows me, knows I'm all interactive and shit. Yeah, that's what they say. Let me prove it.

Last Monday evening, I was on my MacBook Air (thin and light, yet rock solid) and every site I was on, delivered the same annoying ad to me: ASK WOLF! With Blitzer's smug mug promoting the Situation Room on CNN. I couldn't get away from him so, because I'm all interactive and shit, I (dramatic music) clicked on the ad to ask Wolf a question. Much like Tom Cruise in Eyes Wide Shut, I had no idea what was about to happen.

After a few clicks to actually get to the point to "Ask Wolf", the site offered me three ways. Upload a video,Tweet to @wolfblitzer or post a question on the Situation Room's page.

So first I composed my question. Knowing Blitzer is the senior political anchor who's interviewed world leaders, I needed a really pertinent question. "Where'd ya get those cool glasses?" wasn't gonna cut it. So I went with the world leader/pop culture category and asked, "Between Nelson Mandela and Lady Gaga, who smelled better? I know, it's what we all want to know, you're welcome.

Read more

We Were Promised Jetpacks

A day doesn't go by when I don't say out loud, "Good Christ, where's my jetpack?" When I was a kid, I was sure by now I'd be flying over the trees, soaring through the air, on my way to work in my one-piece zip-up unitard.

Just yesterday, I decided to check out if I could buy a jetpack on-line. And you know what I found? This internet thing is way more valuable to me than a silly old jetpack. Not only can I get my dream jet-pack, there are tons of cool things I "need".

Here are just a few:

1. A Human Skull. The Bone Room-Tibetan Decorated Human Skulls & Skull Caps Tibetan Decorative Human Skull-$1500
2. Uranium-cheapest lump, $29
3. Owl Puke and Wolf Urine
4. A Hilary Clinton Nutcracker the Official Hillary Nutcracker and Corkscrew Bill website!
5. Eyeball Jar (ya gotta keep em somewhere)

Read more

Coachella Loves You Back

Live music is as much about the audience as the performer. All great bands will tell you they play differently depending on the energy of the crowd in front of them. And some will tell you, that on rare occasions, the crowd is part of the band.

Coachella Music and Arts Festival gets inside you like a song lyric. Like the Hotel California, “You can check-out but you can never leave.” Each year I go to Coachella, I leave a little piece of me there. But I return with more than I left with. That’s what’s amazing about art, in its purest sense, it gives back to you more than it takes from you. At the festival, I get to hear and see things that make me feel. Extremes clash with your senses. I really enjoyed the Black Keys; I did not enjoy Snoop, but Tupac was dope. I loved the windmill sculpture; the Asia Shrine… not so much. And the reason it’s such an amazing festival is that in the truest sense of Woodstock, the people at the festival, are all part of the performance. We are one huge piece of moving, cart wheeling, flip-flopping, head-bouncing, body-painted, art.

People will tell you they feel a “vibe” about the festival. Not just “peace, love and rock & roll.” but a tangible vibe of happiness. That’s not to say you won’t find unhappy, angry people. Or pick-pockets, thieves and gypsies. It’s 120,000 people who attend Coachella, but my opinion is you’ll find more debauchery per capita at the Young Life Camp at Lost Canyon in Williams, AZ.

Art and music fuel the soul, and nowhere is it more perceptible than standing deep in the crowd, watching a band. The artists on stage feel it. Performers crave that drug of applause, it’s the juice that keeps them going on the long bus rides from El Paso to San Diego. It’s the little hug from a stranger that’s pushes them to write one more song for the new album. In this era of digital, synthesized, pre-programmed technology, it’s refreshing to hear a guy like Andrew Bird strum a violin and whistle. A few years ago, I was standing next to Matt Bellamy from the band Muse watching the crowd fill the field in front of the main stage. I said to him, “I love Coachella.” He smiled and said, ” And Coachella loves you back.”

Bringing QR Codes to Life

QR codes are everywhere you look.  Even Heinz Ketchup bottles have been accessorized with one.  However, the story stays the same with these Pac-man looking boxes.  They often lead to landing pages that do little to bring the brand story to life.  QR codes continually push the same message, and only to smartphone users.  Very few brands use them to actually take their story to the next level.  However, there is hope.

Some companies are incorporating logos into QR codes.  This not only helps raise brand awareness, it also adds a little flare and color to a not-so-appealing box.  Companies such as Shell and Best Buy have taken advantage of this technology.  But, some worry that decorating codes this way won’t work. Testing is the only way to make sure that the logo isn’t covering too much of the actual QR code.  The main thing is to make sure the three large corner boxes aren’t covered.  If these can’t be scanned, all is lost.

Beyond incorporating logos, SpyderLynk recently evolved the QR code into the more aesthetically appealing SnapTag.  With SnapTags, the company’s logo stands front and center and is enclosed by an encoded ring.  Each ring is personalized and helps consumers interact with the brand through promotions, discounts, or company news.  SnapTags allow a brand to come to life.  They can be any size and placed just about anywhere.  SnapTags are also much more flexible when it comes to re-coding.  You can change where the QR code sends someone without redoing the code, which then eliminates the cost of reprinting.

When I started looking into SnapTags, I found an article on how Glamour used one on its September 2011 cover.  Low and behold, I just so happened to have that issue.  Unlike the QR Code, you can access the contents of the SnapTag by using a scanner app OR by taking a picture and texting it.  This opens up the possibility for consumers without smartphones to check out different companies.  On the Glamour cover, there’s a 5-digit number to text the SnapTag to.  After a quick snap and send, I received a text message that said “Watch Glamour’s exclusive Rihanna video!” with a link to the video.  Viola!  As simple as that.  And if Glamour wants to use this same SnapTag for a different month’s cover, it can leave the same ring and logo but re-code it to lead to a different link.

So, between plain QR codes, QR codes with logos, and SnapTags, what’s inhibiting these tools from taking off and bringing brands to life?  One issue could be that people just don’t know what they are or what opportunities they hold.  They are also relatively time-consuming.  For some smartphone users, it’s faster to “Google” the brand they’re looking at rather than trying to figure out that scanner-app-thingy on their iPhone.

It may be that QR codes have been incorporated into traditional media outlets, but in the wrong ways.  There was a billboard by our office that had one and every day I drove by thinking “how the heck am I supposed to drive AND scan that?”  It’s not about placing them on everything, but about using them where they need to be and where they are accessible.

Samuel Adams did just that over this past holiday season.  Instead of using a “standard” placement, such as their bottle or box, they took it to the next level and incorporated their QR code on a bar coaster.  But not just any bar coaster.  This Samuel Adams coaster had four panels that when folded, showed a different image each time. One panel had the QR code on it that led fans to a mobile page where they could sign up for a coupon towards a Sam Adams glass.  Not only was Samuel Adams engaging consumers at their point of purchase, they took an ordinary object and turned it into an interactive marketing tool.  Genius!

It’s going to take more time for QR codes to catch on across a broader audience, but we’re moving in the right direction.  Given the fast pace of technology, something will definitely come along to compete.  QR codes will need to be one step ahead of the game to stay afloat.
In addition to updates to maintain relevance and capture interest, what’s the biggest obstacle that needs to be conquered?  Placing them for a purpose, not just “because,” to better assist the brand. The more strategically placed they are, the more scans a code will receive, and the more life the brand will have.

The Internet Ruined Cool

A few days ago that tweet caught my eye. It’s one more line item on the lengthy list of Things to Blame the Internet For. If there was such a list, it would probably wrap around the earth a few times and include things such as bad grammar and a lack of privacy. I’ll admit it, the internet doesn’t have a great rap sheet and I’m not sure it’s innocent on many of these claims either. Cool, however, is not something that has been ruined by the internet.

Let’s take a closer look at the statement because to me, it can be interpreted in two ways:

A. The internet has the ability to spread content to so many people, that once everyone has seen it, it is no longer cool.
B. The vast amount of online platforms for people to create, upload, and share their content has led to everyone copying one another.

Looking at each of those statements from an advertisers’ perspective, I see a world of opportunity. It may seem counter intuitive, but it should be our goal to get our clients’ brands to be so successful in the digital space that they are no longer cool. Think about it for a second. Can you imagine if your campaign was seen by so many people that everyone that was cool had seen it? Can you imagine if everyone started copying your ads and making their own to share with others?

The internet’s potential to ruin cool is the best thing advertisers could ask for. It is a breath of fresh air. One of the best examples of the internet ruining cool is Old Spice’s “The Man Your Man Could Smell Like” campaign. Either way you interpret the statement above, the campaign is guilty on both accounts. First, it spread to so many people that consumers felt that everyone had already seen it. If you watched those YouTube videos today, they probably wouldn’t be that cool anymore. Secondly, the campaign was copied by scores of people. I bet if you filmed another Old Spice knock-off commercial today, it wouldn’t be that cool. Thanks to the internet, Old Spice’s commercials aren’t that cool anymore. And I bet if you asked the CEO of Procter & Gamble, he wouldn’t care one bit.

All in all, the internet shouldn’t be blamed for ruining cool. It should be praised for giving advertisers our greatest challenge – ruining cool.